Archaeology after 1966
Regulatory Archaeology after the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966
A big change occurred in 1966 with the passage of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA). The passage of the NHPA was spurred at least in part by losses to the historic fabric of American cities caused by the excesses of highway building and suburban sprawl. Section 106 of the NHPA required federal agencies to take into account the effects of their actions on National Register or National Register eligible properties, a mandate that was eventually extended to projects receiving federal funds or needing federally-issued permits to move forward.
Excavations at the Hermann-Grima House Complex
A multi year investigation at the Hermann-Grima House Complex marked the first sustained research at a historic site in the neighborhood, with archaeology intended to solve site-specific questions as to the function of buildings, the chronology of architectural additions, and the origins of anomalous features in the complex courtyard.
Click through photographs from the Hermann-Grima House Exacavation
Excavations at Fort St. Ferdinand and Congo Square
The identification of the city’s fortifications and of military emplacements in the surrounding area was a goal of many historical archaeological projects during the 1970s, and work was carried out at Spanish Fort, Fort Pike, Fort St. John, and Fort St. Mary, among others. It was interest in the city’s fortifications that would help spur one of the first large-scale urban investigations of the 1970s, that at the Jazz Complex and Congo Square in what is now Louis Armstrong Park. Investigations represented an important step in the application of the NHPA and related laws to urban deposits, one that would soon see much more thorough realization in other contract work throughout the city.
Click through photographs from the Fort St. Ferdinand and Congo Square Exacavation
Excavations at Big Oak Island
Investigations continued at pre-contact era sites in Orleans Parish during the 1970s and 1980s, with the best known and most extensive being those conducted by Richard Shenkel of the University of New Orleans at Big and Little Oak Island (16OR6 and 16OR7). These sites remain a significant long-term concern for the archaeology of the New Orleans area, as do other undiscovered sites in the surrounding lakefront area.
Excavations at Little Oak showed greater evidence of year-round habitation, including the remains of at least two different structures, but also a shorter period of use. The site contained dense quantities of pottery and faunal remains that demonstrated the diversity of food sources for the people of the Tchefuncte culture, including white-tailed deer, muskrat, freshwater drum, gar, bowfin, alligator, and turtle.
Shell middens, or deposits of refuse made up of discarded brackish water clam shells (or Rangia cuneata), are the most visible Native American sites in this area. They often form the highest land in the low-lying marshes between Lake Pontchartrain and Lake Borgne, which makes them home to distinct floral and faunal communities, as attested to in the names of the sites themselves.
Interspersed within shell middens are numerous other types of material remains: bits of pottery, stone and bone tools, items of adornment, animal bones discarded from meals, and even human burials. Some shell middens also contain distinct living surfaces, including hearths, post holes from dwellings and shelters, and pits.
Excavating at the Oak Island sites was not easy. Supposedly the 1930s excavations were called off prematurely because of the difficult field conditions. The sites are difficult to reach, especially in wet weather, and heat, water, mosquitoes, stinging insects, and poisonous snakes made summer field schools there an adventure.
An important development related to the Oak Island archaeology projects was the creation in 1982 of the “Indian Youth Project”. That year, Richard Shenkel and Pete Gregory launched a project with the Inter-Tribal Council of Louisiana and the Louisiana Department of Culture, Recreation, and Tourism to host a workshop (at UNO and on site at Big Oak) on archaeology for 50 participants from the Jena Band of Choctaw, the Coushatta Tribe, the Chitimacha Tribe, the Tunica-Biloxi, and the United Houma Nation. The workshop was intended to introduce young people to the goals and objectives of archaeology, the codes of ethics for professional archaeologists, and the benefits of archaeological studies of the past. Such an effort prefigures the increased attention to tribal concerns and stakeholder outreach that would eventually be enshrined in the passage of the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (or NAGPRA) in 1990.




















